shlouai/dsh-debate 预览 preview

shlouai/dsh-debate

Plugin插件 Native原生 ⭐ 2 MIT UI & Themes界面与主题

Stop asking your agent what it thinks. Make it hold a trial.

Project Overview项目介绍

dsh-debate is a DSH-native debate plugin for DeepSeek Harness, distributed as an npm bundle named @shlouai/dsh-debate and installed into a dsh profile without modifying the harness installation or its checkout. It exposes exactly three tools that split a formal argument across several model turns: debate_open fixes the motion and round count and returns a debate_id; debate_round spends precisely one round by spawning two fresh, isolated FOR and AGAINST subagents that never see the judging conversation or each other's personas; and debate_verdict is the main agent's single ruling pass, returning a round-by-round review and the winner as pro, con, or draw.

The typical workflow is asking a judgment-prone question such as "should we adopt framework X" or "is this contract clause safe to sign", watching two adversarial children research the workspace and the web, read each other's speeches, and rebut with citations, and finally receiving the judge's reasoning alongside the full transcript. The whole debate is projected into one folded Chat card in the DSH Web UI that fills in round by round, with built-in zh and en dictionaries, and the card survives a page reload because the plugin records its state inside the meta of ordinary tool/result events rather than declaring a custom session event type.

Dependencies are Node ^22.19 || >=24, strict TypeScript, and pnpm; the build runs against a deepseek-harness checkout, so contributors need that source tree locally. Debaters are restricted by tools.restrict() to a read-only allow list that includes read, glob, grep, web_search, and web_fetch, so they cannot write files or run commands; missing or unauthenticated tools degrade by being dropped once and logged. maxRounds defaults to 8 with two to three rounds recommended, the live debate is process-local and cannot be shared across sessions, and version 0.1.0 is explicitly experimental with the tool surface and config schema still subject to change.

dsh-debate 是 DeepSeek Harness(DSH)原生的辩论插件,以 bundle 形式安装到 dsh profile,不改动 Harness 安装目录。它通过三个工具把一场正式辩论拆给主 agent 调度:debate_open 锁定议题与回合数并返回 debate_id;debate_round 每调用一次跑一轮,派出互相隔离、互不可见的新建 FOR / AGAINST 子 agent,双方都默认挂载 read glob grep web_search web_fetch 用于取证;debate_verdict 由主 agent 在最后一轮给出逐回合评审与胜方结论。

典型场景是用户向 agent 提出"是否迁移到 X"这类容易自我合理化的判断题:插件启动后两条对立子线带着真实证据交锋,主 agent 直到辩论结束才打破沉默裁定,整段纪要作为一张折叠 Chat 卡片在 DSH Web UI 中随回合逐步展开。适合在决策分歧大、需先穷尽反对意见的架构选型、风险评估、对外承诺等场景使用,不适合需要多轮来回确认的事实问答。

依赖 Node ^22.19 || >=24、严格 TypeScript 与 pnpm,源码仍需绑定 deepseek-harness checkout 才能构建。debater 强制只读 tools.restrict(),无法写文件或执行命令;默认 maxRounds=8,两三轮为常用区间。版本 0.1.0 仍标 experimental,工具面与配置 schema 可能变动,npm 包名为 @shlouai/dsh-debate,许可证 MIT。

Pre-install check安装前体检Compatibility · Security兼容性 · 安全性 1 warning1 项注意
  • Only 2 stars - very few users, little community feedback星标只有 2,几乎没人在用,遇到问题缺少社区反馈
DSH walks through these 9 checksDSH 会逐条核对这 9 项

Compatibility兼容性

  • DSH, Node, OS and profile requirementsDSH 版本 / Node 版本 / 操作系统 / profile 是否满足要求
  • External dependencies and runtimes (Electron / Python / Docker, ...)外部依赖与运行时(Electron / Python / Docker 等)是否齐备
  • Conflicts with installed plugins: command names, skill / tool names, ports, duplicate MCP registration与已装插件是否冲突:命令名、skill / tool 重名、端口占用、重复 MCP 注册

Security安全性

  • Repo matches the facts registered here; archived or abandoned?仓库是否与页面登记一致,是否归档或长期停更
  • Safety of preinstall / install / postinstall and install.sh / setup.ps1preinstall / install / postinstall 与 install.sh、setup.ps1 是否安全
  • curl|bash, download-then-execute, obfuscation, unrelated domains → stop immediatelycurl|bash、下载即执行、混淆代码、无关域名 → 立刻停止
  • Typosquatting or unmaintained packages among the new dependencies新增依赖里有没有 typosquatting 或无人维护的包
  • Requested permissions vs. what the feature actually needs申请了哪些权限、是否超出功能所需(filesystem / network / shell / clipboard)
  • Any sudo / admin requirement, plus uninstall and rollback是否要求 sudo / 管理员权限,以及卸载与回滚方式

Anything uncertain must be marked unknown with a note on how to confirm it. This site's signal screen is a static snapshot, not a security audit.拿不准的必须标「未知」并说明要我怎么确认。本站的信号筛查是静态快照,不能替代安全审计。

Or use CLI install (for developers)或使用命令行安装(适合开发者)

CLI Install命令行安装

dsh plugin --profile web add @shlouai/dsh-debate

把 shlouai/dsh-debate 加入你的 DSH 配置(web profile)即可启用。

READMEREADME

dsh-debate

Stop asking your agent what it thinks. Make it hold a trial.

A DeepSeek Harness plugin that answers a hard question by staging a formal debate — two adversarial subagents argue opposite sides with real research, and the main agent rules on the transcript.

License Node TypeScript Status

English · 简体中文

A debate running in the dsh Web UI: the motion is fixed, two subagents argue each round, and the judge rules at the end


Why

Ask an agent "should we migrate to X?" and you get one voice reasoning in one direction. It will find the arguments that support wherever it started, because nothing in the loop is paid to attack them.

dsh-debate puts an adversary in the loop. The FOR side and the AGAINST side are separate one-shot subagents that never see your conversation, never see the judge's opinion, and are each told to win. Both may read the workspace and search the web before speaking, so a claim is something a debater can show rather than something it remembers. Only after the last round does the main agent break its silence and rule.

What you get back is not a confident paragraph. It is a transcript where the strongest case against your idea was made on purpose, by something that wanted to beat it.

How it works

sequenceDiagram
    autonumber
    actor User
    participant Judge as Judge<br/>your agent
    participant For as FOR debater<br/>fresh child
    participant Against as AGAINST debater<br/>fresh child

    User->>Judge: Debate whether we should adopt X, 2 rounds
    Judge->>Judge: debate_open — fix the motion and round count

    loop each round — debate_round
        Judge->>For: motion + full transcript so far
        For->>For: read / glob / grep / web_search / web_fetch
        For-->>Judge: speech FOR
        Judge->>Against: motion + transcript, including the speech just made
        Against->>Against: research and rebut
        Against-->>Judge: speech AGAINST
    end

    Judge->>Judge: debate_verdict — assess round by round, rule once
    Judge-->>User: winner, reasoning, and the whole transcript

Showing the opening section of the README — the full document lives in the repository以上为 README 开头摘要,完整文档在仓库内 · View the full README on GitHub →在 GitHub 查看完整 README →

← 上一个 Prev dsh-cli 下一个 Next dsh-chat-archive →